tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1247368540862329841.post5026517574808758134..comments2023-06-07T08:50:33.280-05:00Comments on Immanent Transcendence: Dancing in Time, Singing in Tune: Harman and Temporalitykhadimirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12960757465883819380noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1247368540862329841.post-51112476247231761052012-01-17T08:17:44.007-06:002012-01-17T08:17:44.007-06:00Thanks, I have not. I am interested in this, asi...Thanks, I have not. I am interested in this, aside from the curiousity that drives much of my OOO exploration, but also because I have been working with temporality in my own work. The earlier book was more than enough to convince me that he didn't make the common mistake of spatializing time, and that alone is reason enough to read all that I can on the subject.khadimirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12960757465883819380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1247368540862329841.post-15150753227513921302012-01-17T02:44:36.321-06:002012-01-17T02:44:36.321-06:00Hi Jason, not sure if you have seen this more rece...Hi Jason, not sure if you have seen this more recent (2010) piece by Harman on time. The paper is called: <i>'Time, Space, Essence,and Eidos: A New Theory of Causation'</i>. You can find it <a href="http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/133/276" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I think this sets out Harman's theory of time much more clearly than in <i>Guerilla Metaphsysics</i>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com